In an “unpublished” decision issued last week in Hambley v. Dalzell (pdf), a panel of the Appeals Court reversed a Superior Court decision that upheld a zoning board’s approval of a change in a lawful nonconforming use.  Rejecting the Superior Court’s deferential analysis, the panel ruled that a 1988 change in the use of the property to a machine shop was not “substantially similar” to the lawful pre-existing nonconforming use as a publishing business.